zentrik/ experiments

A product bet, under pressure

Find the signal.
Keep the quote.

Jev makes small, typed choices. Zentrik’s code maps them back to the exact words that shaped the call.

Evidence map

Illustrative walkthrough · no provider call

Example only

The product bet

Product teams need one shared inbox for customer feedback.

The call, under pressure

6 of 6 turns connect to this bet. Read both sides before you decide.

SSupports the bet

3
MayaBehavior
“Maya: I paste the request into our support sheet, then copy it into the roadmap doc if three other people ask.”
Inspect this judgment
MayaFriction
“Maya: Finding the original conversation. It can be in email, Slack, or call notes.”
Inspect this judgment
MayaFriction
“Maya: Support can see tickets, but they cannot see which product bet we are testing.”
Inspect this judgment

QAdds a condition

2
MayaConstraint
“Maya: The same request can mean different things. We should not merge them just because the wording matches.”
Inspect this judgment
MayaConstraint
“Maya: If auto-grouping hides the difference between a workaround and a request, I stop trusting it.”
Inspect this judgment

↗Pushes back

1
MayaPreference
“Maya: Do not make another inbox. Put the source next to the decision, and let me check the quote.”
Inspect this judgment

·Adds context

0

Nothing landed here. That is worth noticing.

This walkthrough is illustrative. The shown labels are not a Jev prediction; no transcript leaves this page.

01 · Keep the source

The model returns choices, not rewritten testimony. Zentrik attaches each label to the verbatim turn.

02 · Look for the antiverse

A good bet map makes caveats and pushback visible, not just the quotes that make a feature sound right.

03 · People decide

These are prompts for review, not proof of demand, a product-wide finding, or an automatic roadmap choice.